- Services
- Solutions
- Cleantech Forum events
- About us
- Contact us
Hayward, Calif.-based AEST is seeking $10 million in a Series B round to finance four power-purchase agreements in the U.S. and UK.
The deals, potentially worth $600,000 a year each for the next five years, are based on a proprietary technology AEST developed to capture untapped kinetic energy and sell it for $0.14 per kilowatt hour.
CEO Terry Kenney told the Cleantech Group today that the technology, dubbed Dragon Power Station, is activated when heavy duty vehicles drive over plates embedded into the road. The pressure on the plates initiates a hydraulic pumping system that turns a generator in order to produce electricity. The customer pays AEST for each kilowatt-hour produced, at a predetermined rate that is about 20 percent lower than the commercial cost to purchase electricity.
"Our technology doesnt take up roof space or land space, and it takes the existing way you do business and turns that into electricity," Kenney said. "It's taking your day-to-day operations and turning it into a piggy bank."
AEST has already raised $4.3 million in equity financing from Bob Trimble of Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Trimble Navigation; Fremont, Calif.-based Miller Cubed; and 41 individual investors. The company installed a demonstration project with a 2.5 kW generator in 2005 at the Stevedoring Services of America (SSA) Terminal at the Port of Oakland, Calif., to demonstrate the technology didn't disrupt business.
Now, AEST is seeking the Series B financing to expand that system and start other projects. A full-scale system costs AEST $2.5 million to deploy. The system would consist of about 20 road plates to produce 10,000 to 12,000 kWh per day. After the initial cost to install, AEST would perform minimal maintenance and receive payment for all electricity produced.
"For coal-burning electricity you must continually have the expense of coal, but once our unit is in the ground and operating, the only thing we need is trucks," Kenney said. "There's a small amount of maintenance, and the system is running 98 percent of the time. It's much cheaper than any traditional power source."
Kenney said AEST has signed agreements with SSA for Dragon Power Stations in the ports of Oakland and Long Beach, Calif.; with Sainsbury's for a truck depot in Pinehurst, England; with the U.S. government's Gerneral Services Administration for a border crossing between San Diego and Mexico; and with the Oakland Maritime Support Services at the Oakland port.
The technology can also incorporate a surveillance system for system undercarriages. Typical customers are ports, border crossings and truck depot locations, where trucks are driving at less than 30 miles per hour. The company said it needs between 2,000 and 3,000 trucks to drive over the plates each day in order to optimize the system.
The payback of less than five years would be accelerated to about two and a half if AEST can qualify for renewable energy tax credits. Interim Senior Vice President Bailey Partridge said company officials are meeting with the California Energy Commission this week.
"Renewable energy can't stand on its own. Without government welfare, it wouldn't be a very attractive business," Partridge said. "Our system stands on its own without tax credits, but that's not to say we're not going to politic for those credits."
Kenney said the company has about 94 percent energy conversion efficiency, with the option to store excess power in lithium ion batteries on in the hydraulic system.The company is primarily focused on the U.S. market but is looking into China, Korea, and Australia.
AEST has 2 employees and outsources the manufacturing of its systems.
AEST is one of 35 potential new global investment opportunities that the Cleantech Group added to its dealflow database this week—available exclusively to members of the Cleantech Network. Members can click here to search the dealflow database.
Interested in investing in cleantech companies? Here are two other companies from the Cleantech Group's dealflow database also looking for funding:
Seeking capital? Submit to the Cleantech Group's innovation pipeline.
Browse previous pitches here.
Services
Solutions
Cleantech Forum events
About us
Contact us
Comments
Something for nothing
Submitted on April 20th, 2009 by Nick (not verified)Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this energy being generated as a result of the fuel being consumed by the trucks to create their movement. Hence this system just externalises the cost and efficiencies in creating the kinetic energy. Any kinetic or potential energy that the truck loses it just has to burn some more fuel to make up again.
How this can be called a renewable energy technology beats me. However Im interested to hear points of view on this.
Other devices out there that utilise vibration generators draw close to this line, but typically are micro scale and vibration is an unwanted energy loss. Hence waste = energy
The investors might be better putting their money into retrofitting the trucks with improved roll resistance in their wheels, and try claim the credits that way, and during the whole trip of the truck.
What are other people thoughts.
Cheers
Nick, Australia
Energy Theft
Submitted on April 20th, 2009 by Doug Caldwell (not verified)Please explain how stealing energy from diesel fueled kinetic energy sources, with all the incumbent inefficiencies, is "clean"? This process would be expected to produce substantially higher CO2 emissions than diesel electric generators, which would rank this technology's cleanliness right up there with coal. How is this scalable as a business model when it becomes commonly understood that such theft is occurring and public opinion forces legislation to be written to outlaw it? If this is used only in areas where trucks are guaranteed to be braking, it makes some sense but otherwise not.
You Can't Get Energy For Nothing
Submitted on April 26th, 2009 by Unregistered user (not verified)I agree with the other posts. The energy produced by the trucks driving over the plates (presumably created from the potential energy of the trucks dropping a small distance as the plates compress), will be compensated for by the truck engine needing to haul the truck back up again that small distance - not a clean or efficient way of producing energy
regards
Gareth, New Zealand
Isn't this Energy that's being otherwise dissipated / wasted?
Submitted on June 22nd, 2009 by Narsi Santhanam (not verified)Of course, this energy is not renewable, and I'm not sure if it is claimed to be so anywhere. And I don't think there is enough data to presume that the trucks are going to spend more energy to compensate for the amount they are pressed down than the amount of energy captured. To me, it appears to be more a case of using some of the kinetic energy that is anyway being spent by the trucks - that is, this is energy that is otherwise dissipating into the environment.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, more than willing to learn
It's not Renewable but "Harvested energy"
Submitted on June 27th, 2009 by Anoop (not verified)I don't think we can call this as a renewable energy as the generation depends on movement of vehicles which again is dependent on humans. I like to call this as Harvested energy from waste. While moving, the trucks puts pressure on the road surface, due to its weight and movement, which is normally wasted as heating the road surface as road surface is least compressible. Now, by installing a kinetic plate on the road, this wasted energy is harnessed and used for generating electricity.
Also, I am confused about the term "Kinetic". It is mostly the potential energy of the trucks that is being harvested. So is it fair to call this "kinetic plates".?
regards,
Anoop, Dubai.
Post new comment