Submitted on March 31st, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)
I'd also like to believe it's plausible.
The ZENN dealer in my area (Fairfax, VA) claimed this past fall that the car would be ready in January 2008. The salesman even asked if I'd like to place an order. I declined and judging by the company's latest delay, glad I did.
What holds back my optimism in addition to the above actiona is 's stubborn secrecy despite already having a patent: why continue to be tight lipped about the production capability? About demonstrating the battery before the public eye? The only thing that does make sense is the risk-free promises being made boost share prices.
Time will tell. And there are other promising technologies with greater transparency, e.g. MIT's work.
I find a bit of irony in the statement, "The average ...
Poll
"As a company featured in Cleantech, we were quite pleased with your coverage. The story conveyed a strong and accurate understanding of our company's technology and value proposition. Great job!"
Global premier sponsors include
Lead sponsors/partners include
All sponsors | All partners
I'd also like to believe
Submitted on March 31st, 2008 by Unregistered user (not verified)I'd also like to believe it's plausible.
The ZENN dealer in my area (Fairfax, VA) claimed this past fall that the car would be ready in January 2008. The salesman even asked if I'd like to place an order. I declined and judging by the company's latest delay, glad I did.
What holds back my optimism in addition to the above actiona is 's stubborn secrecy despite already having a patent: why continue to be tight lipped about the production capability? About demonstrating the battery before the public eye? The only thing that does make sense is the risk-free promises being made boost share prices.
Time will tell. And there are other promising technologies with greater transparency, e.g. MIT's work.