As a scientist Prof Schwartz should know that he must based his models of analyses, or theories on hard fact. But Prof. Schwarz is basing his theories on assumptions. And these assumptions seem to come from his state of mind. This is the problem with today's western consumer mindset. Since the mid 1960s we have fallen in love with our own desires and selfishness that it affects our judgement. He is even more absurd than Senator Palin. Senator Palin was born a Roman Catholic - and would have been educated that the Old Testament contained a lot of metaphors, as well as a history of the Jewish people before the birth of Jesus. She would have also been informed that evolution was the work of God, abd that the Book of Genesis is not accurate in the scientific sense, but is a metaphor for the birth of humanity, and the role of pride and humility in the human condition. She would have been taught the teachings of New Testament, concerning human living, are the guide for human happiness, and the basis of Christianity. She then became Evanelical, and chose to believe in the doctrine of Creationism. In the same way Prof Schwarz would have learned all about the scientific method. He would have been taught the importance of studying the empirical evidence. And the importance of compleetely discounting speculation, crowd thinking or his own inbuilt assumptions. But Prof Schwarz then seems to have discarded all of this training and gone for something even more ourtageous than Sarah Palin. This makes it interesting to see him making fun of Senator Palin. They are very alike, in their paths of intellectual digression. Both are fine human beings. But before any of us ask others to believe us, we should get our intellectual honesty in order. We must have the humility to see the facts. Which is probably where Religion and Science are supposed to meet !!!